Benchmark #254

Download
CP2077 LAVD-git vs. BORE 5.2.10

5800X - 6950XT Low preset - FSR Ultra Performance - 1440p

Submitted 1 month ago by lionheartp

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.6-200.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
LAVD Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.6-200.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` - This run achieved the highest average FPS, which was approximately 9% higher than the alternative configuration. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE` - This run had a marginally lower standard deviation in FPS, indicating slightly more consistent frame rates. The variance and standard deviation were nearly identical between the two runs. * **Best overall**: `BORE` - Given its higher average FPS and marginally better stability, this configuration provided the best overall performance. # Issues: * The `LAVD` configuration had approximately 9% lower mean FPS compared to the other configuration, indicating a notable decline in performance. * The CPU temperature in the `LAVD` configuration was lower by around 12%, which may suggest less CPU utilization. * The GPU load in the `LAVD` configuration was lower by about 6%, possibly indicating underutilization of GPU resources. * Variance in GPU core clock was significantly lower in `LAVD`, indicating less fluctuation but at a lower average clock speed. # Summary This benchmark compared the performance of the `LAVD` and `BORE` configurations on a system powered by an AMD Ryzen 7 5800X CPU and an AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT GPU running on Nobara Linux 40. The `BORE` configuration provided superior performance with an approximate 9% higher average FPS and marginally better frame rate consistency. The `LAVD` configuration, although slightly more stable in terms of GPU core clock, had a lower GPU load and a significantly lower CPU temperature, suggesting it might not be utilizing the hardware as effectively as the `BORE` configuration.