# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `House Flipper Nobara CPU MHz Included` - Delivers the highest mean FPS, indicating strong overall performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `House Flipper Cachy CPU MHz Included` - Exhibits the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, resulting in the most consistent and smooth gameplay experience. * **Best overall**: `House Flipper Nobara (GPU Stats Fix)` - Achieves a good balance between FPS and consistency, performing well across multiple metrics without any significant issues. # Issues: * The run using the `powersave` scheduler (`House Flipper Cachy CPU MHz Included`) produced significantly lower mean FPS and higher frame time compared to others, indicating inferior performance. * The `schedutil` scheduler run (`House Flipper Cachy (Original)`) has GPU data missing, which impacts the accuracy and comparability of the results. # Summary The benchmark compares the performance of House Flipper using different combinations of two Linux schedulers (`performance` and `powersave`) on the `Nobara` and `Cachy` kernels. Notably, the `performance` scheduler under the `Nobara` kernel showed the highest FPS, while the `powersave` scheduler under the `Cachy` kernel reported lower FPS and higher frame times, indicating a potential limitation with this configuration. Despite slight variations in GPU temperature and RAM usage, the `performance` scheduler consistently provided better and more consistent results, making it better suited for gaming in this benchmark.