# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bore1` has the highest average FPS, consistently outperforming the rest by approximately 4%. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bore2` demonstrates the lowest FPS variance and standard deviation, ensuring the smoothest gameplay experience. * **Best overall**: `bore1` delivers the highest average FPS with a slightly larger standard deviation than `bore2`, making it the best overall considering performance. # Issues: * One of the tested configurations featuring the second `bore2` run exhibits a significantly reduced average FPS by roughly 3.8% compared to the highest performer (`bore1`). Given the same hardware and software environment, this suggests a potential issue with FPS consistency. # Summary This benchmark evaluates the performance of various schedulers available in `sched_ext` for a gaming context using `Isonzo` under `CachyOS` with identical hardware configurations. The `bore1` configuration showcases the highest overall FPS, proving itself superior in raw performance. However, when focusing on frame stability, the `bore2` configuration offers the most consistent FPS. On the other hand, the second `bore2` run demonstrates significantly lower FPS, indicating possible issues in scheduler efficiency or implementation, meriting further investigation. The `sched_ext` environment proves crucial for analyzing different scheduling strategies' impacts on gaming performance, emphasizing consistency and peak performance.