# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-performance` with mean FPS approximately 2% higher than the next closest run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-performance` with the lowest FPS variance and standard deviation. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-lowlatency`, balancing high FPS and relatively low variance. # Issues: * The `lavd` runs exhibit approximately 11% lower average FPS compared to the `bpfland` runs. This significant performance gap suggests `lavd` might be less efficient for this benchmark. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of the `lavd` and `bpfland` configurations of OBS x264 on `osu!stable` using CachyOS with an AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition and AMD Radeon Graphics. The `bpfland` configuration generally achieves higher performance, with the `bpfland-performance` specifically providing the highest FPS and the `bpfland-lowlatency` offering a balanced profile. Meanwhile, the `lavd` configurations consistently show around an 11% decline in FPS compared to `bpfland`, indicating that the `bpfland` schedulers might be more optimized for this workload.