# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-next` with approximately 9% higher average FPS (824.89) compared to `lavd-revise`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-revise` with roughly 14% lower FPS standard deviation (345.15) compared to `bpfland-next`. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-next` provides the best overall experience with higher FPS even though it has a bit higher FPS variance. # Issues: * The `bpfland-next` configuration displays a significantly higher CPU temperature (about 7% more) compared to `lavd-revise`, which could be a concern for thermal management. # Summary This benchmark comparison between the `bpfland-next` and `lavd-revise` on the same hardware and software configuration, tested on `osu!stable` with OBS x264, illustrates different strengths in FPS performance and stability. While the `bpfland-next` config delivers higher average FPS, the `lavd-revise` configuration ensures a smoother frame rate with lower variability. This makes `bpfland-next` best for high FPS requirements, albeit at a cost of higher CPU temperature. Both configurations utilize the `powersave` Linux scheduler on CachyOS, with similar GPU and CPU loads, showcasing the variation in their performance profiles despite identical baseline settings.