Benchmark #340

Download
Alan Wake 2 WineHQ Staging 9.9 vs GEProton 9.10 CPU Bound

Submitted 3 weeks ago by rebl11

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
AlanWake2_WineHQ_Staging_9-9 Nobara Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (RADV NAVI32) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 67 GB 6.10.6-200.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
AlanWake2_GEProton_9-10 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (RADV NAVI32) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 67 GB 6.10.6-200.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `AlanWake2_GEProton_9-10` with approximately 10% higher average FPS than the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `AlanWake2_GEProton_9-10` with a slightly lower FPS standard deviation. * **Best overall**: `AlanWake2_GEProton_9-10` offers both better average FPS and more consistent frame times, making it the best overall. # Issues: * The run using WineHQ Staging version had approximately 30% higher CPU load compared to the other, which could explain its lower FPS performance. # Summary This benchmark compared the performance of `WineHQ Staging 9.9` and `GEProton 9.10` running Alan Wake 2 on a system using the `AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT` GPU and `AMD Ryzen 9 5900X` CPU. The results indicate that `GEProton 9.10` provided better overall performance with around 10% higher average FPS and more consistent frame times, despite the `WineHQ Staging 9.9` configuration having significantly higher CPU load. In conclusion, the `GEProton 9.10` configuration is clearly superior for this particular game and setup.