# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `WuKong-Nobara-LAVD` with FPS mean slightly higher than others, resulting in the highest overall average FPS. * **Smoothest FPS**: `WuKong-Nobara-BORE` with the lowest FPS variance and standard deviation. * **Best overall**: `WuKong-Nobara-BORE`, as it provides stable FPS performance while only being marginally lower in average FPS compared to the highest, making it the most balanced. # Issues: * The `WuKong-Nobara-LAVD-performance` run has a significantly higher FPS variance, making it less stable compared to the other runs. * The GPU core clock fluctuation in the `WuKong-Nobara-LAVD` run is much higher than in others, indicating potential inefficiencies or instabilities. * GPU power usage in the `WuKong-Nobara-LAVD-performance` run is significantly lower compared to others, suggesting a potential performance throttling issue. # Summary This benchmark compared the performance of the game on different scheduler configurations (`BORE`, `LAVD`, and `LAVD-performance`) using an AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT GPU and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X CPU at a high preset setting with FSR 100 at 1440p resolution. The `BORE` scheduler demonstrated the best overall performance with stable and smooth FPS, while the `LAVD` scheduler provided the highest average FPS. However, the `LAVD-performance` run showed significant instability and lower GPU power usage, highlighting inefficiencies in that configuration. Overall, the `BORE` scheduler seems to offer the best balance between frame rate and stability for this setup.