Benchmark #396

Download
osu!stable + OBS x264 - lavd-turbo-tuning vs bpfland !594

Submitted 2 weeks ago by .dnaim

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
bpfland-L CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.7-2-cachyos-lto powersave
bpfland-L-k CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.7-2-cachyos-lto powersave
lavd-no-core-compaction CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.7-2-cachyos-lto powersave
lavd-autopilot CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.7-2-cachyos-lto powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd-autopilot` - This run achieved the highest average FPS, outperforming other configurations by a noticeable percentage. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-no-core-compaction` - This run had the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, resulting in the most stable and consistent experience. * **Best overall**: `lavd-autopilot` - This run, despite having a higher standard deviation in FPS, provided significantly higher average FPS while maintaining comparable stability. # Issues: * The runs with the `bpfland` scheduler (both `bpfland-L` and `bpfland-L-k`) demonstrated significantly higher variability in FPS, with almost twice the standard deviation compared to the `lavd` scheduler runs. This leads to a less consistent experience. # Summary This benchmark compared the performance of the `lavd` and `bpfland` schedulers on the `osu!stable` and `OBS x264` workloads on a CachyOS system with the AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS and AMD Radeon Graphics. The `lavd` scheduler, particularly in the `autopilot` configuration, provided the highest average FPS and maintained acceptable stability, making it the best overall performer. Conversely, the `bpfland` scheduler exhibited higher FPS variability, leading to a less stable performance. This highlights the impact of different scheduler implementations on game and streaming performance.