# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Cyberpunk2077_Default_BORE` with an average FPS significantly higher compared to other configurations, offering a noticeable performance boost. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Cyberpunk2077_Default_LAVD-performance` with the lowest standard deviation in FPS, ensuring the most consistent frame times. * **Best overall**: `Cyberpunk2077_Default_BORE` for its superior average FPS coupled with relatively low variability, making it the best choice for both performance and stability. # Issues: * The LAVD configuration tends to have significantly lower FPS (around 28% less) compared to the BORE configuration, suggesting it might not be optimized for performance in this benchmark. * Both `Cyberpunk2077_Default_LAVD` and `Cyberpunk2077_Default_LAVD-autopilot` demonstrate standard deviations and variances approximately 20% higher than `Cyberpunk2077_Default_BORE`, leading to less stable frame rates. * The average GPU load and temperatures are lower in the LAVD runs, which may indicate that the resource utilization is not as efficient as in the BORE configuration. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of Cyberpunk 2077 under different Linux Advanced Virtual Dispatch (`LAVD`) configurations against the Best Overall Run-time Environment (`BORE`). The BORE setup significantly outperforms all tested `LAVD` configurations in terms of average FPS, providing a substantial boost in performance. Although the `LAVD-performance` configuration offers the smoothest gameplay with the least variance in frame rates, it still falls behind in overall FPS. This suggests that while `LAVD` may offer more consistent performance, it might not fully utilize the hardware capabilities compared to `BORE`.