# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `riftbreaker_BORE` - This run delivers the highest average FPS. * **Smoothest FPS**: `riftbreaker_LAVD_autopilot` - This run has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `riftbreaker_BORE` - Achieves the highest average FPS with reasonably low variance, making it the best all-rounder. # Issues: * `riftbreaker_LAVD_performance` shows significantly higher FPS variance compared to other runs, impacting stability. * `riftbreaker_LAVD_no_core_compaction` exhibits higher FPS mean but at the cost of a higher variance, leading to less consistent performance. * `riftbreaker_LAVD` has comparatively lower mean FPS and higher frame time variance, making it less desirable for consistent gaming experience. # Summary This benchmark compares various configurations of the `LAVD` system for gaming. The key focus is on evaluating performance metrics such as FPS, frame time stability, and resource utilization using different configurations and scenarios like autopilot and disabling core compaction. Overall, the system using `riftbreaker_BORE` showed the best performance in terms of high FPS and acceptable stability, while other configurations like `riftbreaker_LAVD_performance` and `riftbreaker_LAVD_no_core_compaction` had stability issues, despite delivering competitive FPS levels.