# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-next-autodomain` with approximately 4% higher mean FPS compared to the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-no-core-compaction` with the lowest standard deviation in FPS, showcasing the highest stability. * **Best overall**: `lavd-no-core-compaction` due to close-to-maximum performance with significantly higher stability. # Issues: * `bpfland-next-autodomain` has the highest variance and standard deviation in FPS, indicating significant fluctuations in performance. * The third run under `bpfland-next-autodomain-L` setup exhibits a higher mean temperature (up 4% compared to others) and less stability in frame time. # Summary The benchmark compares the performance of `lavd` versus `bpfland` schedulers on `CachyOS` using `AMD Radeon Graphics` and `AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition`. The `lavd` scheduler delivers smoother performance overall with lower variation in FPS and frame time despite slightly lower peak performance compared to the `bpfland` scheduler. On the other hand, `bpfland` shows promising high FPS but suffers from stability issues, with significant variations likely causing impact to real-world gameplay experience. Therefore, while `bpfland` might offer peak FPS under ideal conditions, `lavd` ensures a more consistent and reliable performance.