# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Cyberpunk2077_2024-09-10_Custom_MAX_BORE` with approximately 55% higher average FPS compared to the lowest. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Cyberpunk2077_2024-09-10_Custom_MAX_LAVD` with a significantly lower FPS variance and standard deviation. * **Best overall**: `Cyberpunk2077_2024-09-10_Custom_MAX_LAVD` due to its balanced performance with a moderate FPS and smooth experience. # Issues: * The performance of the run using the `BPFLAND` scheduler is significantly worse, with an average FPS around 35% lower than the next closest run. * The frame time for the run using the `BPFLAND` scheduler is approximately 20% higher on average, indicating more frame pacing issues. * The GPU power usage for the `BPFLAND` run is almost half of the highest run, indicating possible underutilization of the GPU. # Summary In this benchmark comparing the `BORE`, `LAVD`, and `BPFLAND` scheduler variants on Cyberpunk 2077, all hardware and software configurations, except the schedulers, were identical. The `BORE` scheduler delivered the highest FPS, outperforming others by a significant margin, but with increased variability. The `LAVD` scheduler provided the smoothest experience with the lowest frame time variance and a good average FPS, making it the best overall choice. In contrast, the `BPFLAND` scheduler underperformed notably in terms of FPS and frame pacing, suggesting that it may not be well-suited for this type of workload in its current configuration.