Submitted 9 months ago by sacredsin
| Label | OS | GPU | CPU | RAM | OS specific |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyberpunk2077_212_FSR21 | Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (RADV NAVI23) | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor | 34 GB | 6.10.9-200.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance |
| Cyberpunk2077_213_FSR21 | Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (RADV NAVI23) | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor | 34 GB | 6.10.9-200.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance |
| Cyberpunk2077_213_FSR3 | Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (RADV NAVI23) | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor | 34 GB | 6.10.9-200.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance |
Cyberpunk2077_213_FSR3 with a slight increase in average FPS compared to the other runs.Cyberpunk2077_213_FSR21 with the lowest variance, ensuring a more stable frame rate.Cyberpunk2077_213_FSR21, offers a good balance of high FPS with a stable frame rate.This benchmark assesses the performance variations between the 2.12 and 2.13 versions of Cyberpunk 2077, as well as exploring the impact of utilizing FSR 3 versus FSR 2.1. The 2.13 version consistently provides superior performance metrics compared to 2.12, with FSR 3 achieving the highest frame rate, though at the cost of some increased variability. Meanwhile, FSR 2.1 showcases a more stable frame rate, making it a preferable option for users prioritizing consistency. All tests were executed on the same hardware and software environment, allowing for a fair comparison.