# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `fair` with approximately 3% higher FPS than the other two runs, making it the most performant in terms of raw frame rate. * **Smoothest FPS**: `fair` with around 11% lower standard deviation compared to the other runs, indicating more consistent frame delivery and fewer fluctuations in FPS. * **Best overall**: `fair` offers both the highest FPS and smoothest experience, demonstrating superior performance for this benchmark. # Issues: * Despite running the same hardware and configurations, the `lavd` scheduler showed approximately a 3% decrease in FPS compared to the other schedulers. Additionally, the `lavd` configuration resulted in a 3% and 11% higher standard deviation in FPS than the `bpfland` and `fair` setups respectively, indicating less consistent performance. # Summary The benchmark focused on evaluating different Rust schedulers using the same hardware configuration with the `CachyOS` operating system. The `fair` scheduler stood out with the best results, delivering both the highest and the smoothest FPS among the runs. While all runs were conducted under the same conditions – including an identical `Intel Core i5-10600K` processor and `NVIDIA RTX 2060` GPU – the `fair` scheduler clearly optimized the resource usage and frame delivery most effectively. On the other hand, the `lavd` scheduler showed a decline in performance, suggesting it might not be the most optimized choice for this setup. These insights highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate scheduler for optimal gaming performance in specific environments.