# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland` with a mean FPS approximately 3% higher than others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `fair` with a standard deviation of FPS around 17% lower than the highest. * **Best overall**: `bpfland` combines both relatively high FPS and reasonable stability, making it preferable for overall performance. # Issues: * The lowest FPS and higher frame time variability in the third configuration suggest performance inefficiencies compared to others with similar hardware and software setup. # Summary The benchmark compared the performance of different schedulers in the context of the `isonzo` application on `Rust`. The test results indicate that the `bpfland` scheduler delivers the highest frame rates, while the `fair` scheduler offers the smoothest frame delivery. The third configuration, however, displayed slightly lower performance margins, possibly due to scheduler inefficiencies since all other test conditions were identical. This suggests that the `bpfland` scheduler may currently be more optimized for achieving both high and consistent FPS in this environment.