Top runs:

• Highest FPS: fair with approximately 1% higher average FPS compared to the other runs.
• Smoothest FPS: bpfland run, featuring the lowest FPS variance and standard deviation.
• Best overall: bpfland combines smooth FPS with a competitive average FPS, delivering the most balanced performance.

Issues:

• The lavd run shows approximately 2% lower average FPS and higher FPS variance compared to the rest, indicating a potential issue with frame stability.

Summary

This benchmark compares different rust schedulers ("bpfland", "fair", "lavd", "rusty") running on similar hardware and software configurations, allowing us to assess their performance impacts. The bpfland scheduler stands out for its smooth performance, with the least FPS variance and comparable average FPS. Interestingly, the fair scheduler achieves the highest average FPS, slightly outperforming others. However, the lavd scheduler lags in terms of FPS consistency and average performance, suggesting it may be less optimized for this setup. Overall, the evaluation highlights the nuanced performance differences across various rust schedulers on a consistent hardware and OS platform.