# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `fair` with approximately 1% higher average FPS compared to the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland` run, featuring the lowest FPS variance and standard deviation. * **Best overall**: `bpfland` combines smooth FPS with a competitive average FPS, delivering the most balanced performance. # Issues: * The `lavd` run shows approximately 2% lower average FPS and higher FPS variance compared to the rest, indicating a potential issue with frame stability. # Summary This benchmark compares different `rust` schedulers ("bpfland", "fair", "lavd", "rusty") running on similar hardware and software configurations, allowing us to assess their performance impacts. The `bpfland` scheduler stands out for its smooth performance, with the least FPS variance and comparable average FPS. Interestingly, the `fair` scheduler achieves the highest average FPS, slightly outperforming others. However, the `lavd` scheduler lags in terms of FPS consistency and average performance, suggesting it may be less optimized for this setup. Overall, the evaluation highlights the nuanced performance differences across various `rust` schedulers on a consistent hardware and OS platform.