# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpf` with an average FPS approximately 2% higher than others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `fair` with a standard deviation approximately 16% lower than others, indicating more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `bpf` balances the highest average FPS and reasonable standard deviation, suggesting a strong overall performance. # Issues: * The `lavd` scheduler showed approximately 2% lower FPS compared to the other runs, and had a higher standard deviation, indicating less stability. * The `lavd` configuration had a slightly higher CPU temperature (approximately 3% lower than others), but this is not directly an FPS issue. # Summary This benchmark compared the performance of different Rust schedulers on a consistent hardware and software platform, focusing on FPS and stability metrics. The `bpf` scheduler demonstrated the best overall performance with the highest average FPS, while the `fair` scheduler offered the smoothest gameplay with a stable frame rate. Despite all schedulers running on the same `performance` Linux scheduler under the CachyOS with an NVIDIA RTX 2060 GPU and Intel Core i5-10600K CPU, the `lavd` scheduler fell behind in both average FPS and stability, potentially indicating inefficiencies in handling graphical workloads.