# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `fair` and comment * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` and comment * **Best overall**: `fair` and comment # Issues: * The `bore` scheduler showed a noticeably lower average FPS compared to other schedulers, with a reduction of around 2% compared to the best performing scheduler, even though the rest of the setup was consistent. * No significant FPS differences were observed among `bpfland` and `lavd` schedulers compared to the best performer, but `bpfland` did exhibit a slightly higher variability than others. # Summary In this benchmark comparison focusing on different Rust schedulers within the context of the same hardware setup on `CachyOS`, the `fair` scheduler demonstrates the highest average FPS, leading slightly ahead by approximately 2% compared to other runs. The `lavd` scheduler provides the most stable FPS with the least variability, emphasizing its smooth performance even though its average FPS is slightly lower than the top performer. The `bore` scheduler falls behind in terms of FPS while maintaining moderate stability, indicating potential inefficiencies with the `performance` Linux scheduler used across all tests. These results highlight the subtle yet impactful differences that various Rust schedulers can have on FPS performance and frame stability under identical conditions.