# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland` with approximately 0.5% higher mean FPS compared to `fair`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `fair` with approximately 10% less standard deviation than `bpfland`. * **Best overall**: `bpfland` with the highest mean FPS, despite having a slightly higher variability. # Summary In this benchmark comparing different Rust scheduler implementations, both configurations ran under identical system setups. The `bpfland` scheduler exhibits a slight edge in average FPS while maintaining relatively high GPU load and power usage, which might point to a more aggressive utilization of system resources. Alternatively, the `fair` scheduler shows a more stable performance with reduced variance in FPS, possibly leading to a smoother visual experience despite the slightly lower mean FPS. These results suggest a trade-off between maximizing raw performance and achieving smoother frame time distribution between these schedulers on the given hardware.