# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with a higher average FPS compared to the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-main` with a lower standard deviation and variance of FPS. * **Best overall**: `BORE` due to its significantly higher average FPS despite the slightly higher variance in FPS, which provides superior performance in this context. # Issues: * The running environment, including OS, GPU, CPU, RAM, and Linux scheduler, is consistent, so hardware or configuration differences are not a concern. * The `BORE` configuration exhibits a higher average FPS performance compared to other run, but this comes with a marked increase in FPS variance, indicating potential fluctuations in performance stability. # Summary This benchmark analysis compares the performance of osu!stable with stress-ng under two different Linux scheduling configurations: `BORE` and `bpfland-main`, using the `CachyOS` operating system on identical hardware setups. The `BORE` configuration delivers impressive peak FPS rates but shows higher performance variability, while `bpfland-main` maintains more consistent frame times and provides smoother FPS performance. Given the substantial FPS advantage, the `BORE` setup appears more suited for applications prioritizing raw FPS, notwithstanding potential fluctuations.