# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with approximately 65% higher FPS than the lowest performing run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-main-lowlatency` with a variance approximately 38% lower than the highest variance. * **Best overall**: `BORE`, offering both the highest FPS and a balanced variance when compared to alternatives. # Issues: * The configuration labeled as `bpfland-main-lowlatency` has a nearly 40% lower average FPS compared to the leading configuration. This drop might suggest inefficiencies within this scheduler configuration. * The standard deviation in the `bpfland-next` configuration is roughly 15% higher than other configurations, indicating a greater variance in FPS consistency, which could impact smoothness under stress conditions. * The `bpfland-next-lowlatency` has a slightly higher variance, around 5% more than `bope-main-lowlatency`, despite a similar mean FPS to `bpfland-main-lowlatency`, suggesting potential instability in this setup. # Summary The benchmark compares different scheduler configurations running on the `CachyOS` operating system, utilizing an `AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS` CPU and `AMD Radeon Graphics` GPU. The `BORE` scheduler configuration stands out with significantly higher FPS, demonstrating superior performance. In contrast, the `bpfland-main-lowlatency` and `bpfland-next-lowlatency` configurations struggle with poorer frame rates and greater variance, potentially reducing performance efficacy. While `bpfland-main-lowlatency` provides the smoothest performance with the lowest variance, it falls short in delivering competitive FPS. This highlights a potential trade-off in each scheduler configuration between consistency and performance under duress.