# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-main` with slightly higher average FPS compared to `bpfland-pr`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-main` with lower standard deviation and variance in FPS than `bpfland-pr`. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-main` due to its slightly superior performance in both higher FPS and smoother experience. # Summary This benchmark focuses on comparing two configurations using the `bpfland-main` and `bpfland-pr` branch under the same `powersave` scheduler on the Linux Kernel 6.11.3-2-cachyos-naim with the same hardware configuration. Both configurations deliver similar performance, but the `bpfland-main` branch showcases a minimal improvement in average FPS and offers a smoother gaming experience, likely due to its lower FPS variance. The insights suggest that while both configurations perform well under stress conditions, `bpfland-main` might provide a slightly better overall experience.