Benchmark #6

Download
osu!lazer + ffmpeg BORE vs rusty vs lavd vs bpfland

Using same data from https://flightlessmango.com/games/15639/logs/5542

Submitted 2 months ago by .dnaim

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
osu!lazer-rusty Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) 14 GB 6.9.7-cn3.0.lto.fc40.x86_64 powersave
osu!lazer-BORE Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) 14 GB 6.9.7-cn3.0.lto.fc40.x86_64 powersave
osu!lazer-bpflandnext Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) 14 GB 6.9.7-cn3.0.lto.fc40.x86_64 powersave
osu!lazer-lavd Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) 14 GB 6.9.7-cn3.0.lto.fc40.x86_64 powersave
### Top runs - `osu!lazer-lavd`: Highest FPS - `osu!lazer-bpflandnext`: Smoothest FPS - `osu!lazer-rusty`: Best overall ### Issues - `osu!lazer-BORE`: Significantly lower FPS (approximately 40% lower than the best run) ### Summary All four runs were conducted using identical hardware and software configurations, as evidenced by the text fields. `osu!lazer-BORE` stands out as having significantly lower FPS compared to the other three runs, which indicates a performance issue. Excluding this outlier, `osu!lazer-lavd` achieved the highest average FPS, while `osu!lazer-bpflandnext` demonstrated the most consistent performance with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. `osu!lazer-rusty` provides a balanced performance, making it the best overall due to its slightly lower FPS but better consistency compared to `osu!lazer-lavd`.