Using same data from https://flightlessmango.com/games/15639/logs/5542
Submitted 10 months ago by .dnaim
| Label | OS | GPU | CPU | RAM | OS specific |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| osu!lazer-rusty | Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 | Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) | 14 GB | 6.9.7-cn3.0.lto.fc40.x86_64 powersave |
| osu!lazer-BORE | Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 | Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) | 14 GB | 6.9.7-cn3.0.lto.fc40.x86_64 powersave |
| osu!lazer-bpflandnext | Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 | Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) | 14 GB | 6.9.7-cn3.0.lto.fc40.x86_64 powersave |
| osu!lazer-lavd | Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 | Fedora Linux 40 (KDE Plasma) | 14 GB | 6.9.7-cn3.0.lto.fc40.x86_64 powersave |
osu!lazer-lavd: Highest FPSosu!lazer-bpflandnext: Smoothest FPSosu!lazer-rusty: Best overallosu!lazer-BORE: Significantly lower FPS (approximately 40% lower than the best run)All four runs were conducted using identical hardware and software configurations, as evidenced by the text fields. osu!lazer-BORE stands out as having significantly lower FPS compared to the other three runs, which indicates a performance issue. Excluding this outlier, osu!lazer-lavd achieved the highest average FPS, while osu!lazer-bpflandnext demonstrated the most consistent performance with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. osu!lazer-rusty provides a balanced performance, making it the best overall due to its slightly lower FPS but better consistency compared to osu!lazer-lavd.