Submitted 6 months ago by sacredsin
Label | OS | GPU | CPU | RAM | OS specific |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Silent Hill_default | Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (RADV NAVI23) | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor | 34 GB | 6.11.3-3-cachyos performance |
Silent Hill_Ultra Plus | Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (RADV NAVI23) | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor | 34 GB | 6.11.3-3-cachyos performance |
Silent Hill_Sunny Hills_fog | Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (RADV NAVI23) | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor | 34 GB | 6.11.3-3-cachyos performance |
Silent Hill_Silent Optimizer_default | Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (RADV NAVI23) | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor | 34 GB | 6.11.3-3-cachyos performance |
Silent Hill_default
with an average FPS approximately 7% higher than the lowest performing run.Silent Hill_Silent Optimizer_default
with the lowest variance and standard deviation, indicating more stable frame rates.Silent Hill_default
offers a high average FPS along with a fairly low variability, making it the most balanced option.The benchmark for Silent Hill with stutter mods evaluates different configurations on a consistent system setup, leveraging an AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
CPU across a Steam Runtime 3
environment. The evaluations highlight how different modifications impact FPS and stability. The "default" configuration offers a good balance with the highest FPS and relatively steady frame times, while the "Ultra Plus" configuration enhances visuals at the cost of FPS stability. The "Sunny Hills fog" mod attempts to find a middle ground but ultimately falls short in average FPS. Notably, the "Silent Optimizer" sacrifices significant FPS performance, aiming at optimizations which do not translate into higher frame rates.