# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-next-k-L` with the highest mean FPS. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-next-k-L` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-next-k-L`, offering the highest FPS and smoothest performance metrics overall. # Issues: * The `bpfland-next` run results in significantly lower FPS, with the mean FPS being considerably less compared to other configurations while using similar hardware and settings. This run also displays a higher variance in FPS, indicating less smooth performance. * The GPU load for `bpfland-next` is substantially lower compared to the others, potentially indicating underutilization. # Summary The benchmark compares different configurations of kernel settings within the same environment, specifically testing `bpfland-next`, `bpfland-next-k-L`, and `bpfland-next-k` configurations on CachyOS with the same hardware. The `bpfland-next-k-L` configuration provides the best performance, achieving the highest and most consistent FPS with the lowest frame time variance, indicating a more stable gaming experience. In contrast, the `bpfland-next` configuration falls short, delivering significantly lower FPS, which may be linked to underutilization of GPU resources. Thus, the `bpfland-next-k-L` is the optimal configuration for this benchmark.