# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd` has the highest average FPS, with approximately 16% more than the next leading configuration. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` also exhibits the smoothest performance, demonstrating the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating significant stability. * **Best overall**: `lavd` is the best overall, combining both high FPS and excellent stability compared to other runs. # Issues: * The `lavd-tuning` configuration shows significantly lower average FPS, about 14% lower than the best-performing configuration, which could point to potential inefficiencies or misconfigurations during this run. * The frame time variance in the `lavd-tuning` configuration is markedly higher, indicating a less stable performance. This variability can result in a choppy user experience. * The GPU load fluctuates more drastically in the `lavd-tuning` run compared to others, which suggests that this configuration might not be optimal for the set testing environment. # Summary In this benchmark, all configurations ran on the same hardware and operating system, focusing on the performance of the `lavd` scheduler under stress testing conditions with `osu!stable` and `stress-ng`. The plain `lavd` configuration yielded the highest FPS and demonstrated the most stability, making it the superior choice in these tests. Adjusted configurations, `lavd-tuning` and its second version, showed considerable drops in performance and stability, likely due to suboptimal tuning. This suggests that the default `lavd` scheduler settings are better suited for this specific workload on the tested hardware.