# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd` has the highest average FPS with a significant margin over the other configurations. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` also achieves the smoothest performance with the lowest standard deviation and variance of FPS among all runs. * **Best overall**: `lavd` is the best overall, as it combines the highest average FPS with the smoothest performance metrics. # Issues: * The configuration using `bpfland-k` exhibited a noticeably higher RAM consumption compared to the other configurations, despite having similar GPU clock speeds and power use. This may affect performance consistency if reaching memory limits. # Summary The benchmark comparing `bpfland` and `lavd` schedulers on a consistent hardware and software setup reveals that `lavd` is superior in average performance metrics and stability. The `lavd` scheduler manages to maintain a smooth and high FPS while efficiently utilizing system resources. The `bpfland` configurations fall short especially in terms of RAM efficiency and do not match `lavd's` performance benchmark. Both test configurations had the same Linux kernel and `powersave` scheduler, presenting a fair comparison of the two experimental schedulers under the same conditions.