# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd-tuning-v3` with approximately 12% higher average FPS compared to the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-best` with approximately 20% lower variance and standard deviation in FPS, resulting in a more stable performance. * **Best overall**: `lavd-tuning-v3` due to its significantly higher average FPS, despite having higher variability. # Summary The benchmark compared two different configurations of `lavd`, both using the `powersave` Linux scheduler on an AMD Radeon Graphics GPU. The `lavd-tuning-v3` configuration achieved a noticeably higher average FPS, making it the most performant choice, though it exhibited more variability in frame rate. Meanwhile, `lavd-best` provided the smoothest performance with less deviation, though at a lower average FPS. Both configurations shared similar hardware components, ensuring that differences in performance were primarily attributed to tuning rather than distinct hardware factors.