## Top runs - `Highest FPS`: Run `bpfland-latest` with an average FPS around 1% higher compared to `bpfland-previous-commit`. - `Smoothest FPS`: Run `bpfland-previous-commit` with the lowest standard deviation and variance of FPS values, approximately 1% better in stability. - `Best overall`: Run `bpfland-latest` as it offers slightly higher FPS (1%) with a small trade-off in stability (less than 1%). ## Summary Both runs, `bpfland-latest` and `bpfland-previous-commit`, were conducted using identical hardware and software configurations, ensuring a fair comparison. The `bpfland-latest` run provided the highest average FPS, being around 1% more than the `bpfland-previous-commit`. However, `bpfland-previous-commit` showed better stability with a slightly lower standard deviation and variance, making it the smoothest run by about 1%. There are no significant performance issues in any of the runs, and the differences in FPS and stability are marginal, indicating that both runs provide a relatively consistent gaming experience.