# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE-defaults` and it outperform others with around 3% higher average FPS. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE-defaults` with approximately 3% lower standard deviation in FPS, indicating more consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `BORE-defaults` as it delivers both the highest FPS and smoothest performance, making it the standout choice among the runs. # Issues: * The run labeled as `BORE-0.35base` had a noticeably higher variation in FPS compared to the `BORE-defaults` configuration, indicating fluctuations in performance. * The RAM usage in all three configurations is similar, yet the `BORE-defaults` run achieved better FPS, suggesting better optimization or configuration. * Despite similar hardware and OS parameters outlined, the power consumption remains consistent, but `BORE-0.2base` shows slightly higher deviation in energy efficiency. # Summary The BORE benchmark, focused on the `powersave` Linux scheduler using AMD Radeon Graphics, highlights significant differences in FPS performance and consistency across different configurations. The run named `BORE-defaults` provided the best results with approximately 3% higher average FPS and smoother performance. Other configurations, while using similar resources, showed more variability or slightly lower performance, demonstrating the impact of subtle configuration changes on overall system efficiency and performance.