# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `thp-358` with the highest average FPS performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `thp-307` with the lowest FPS standard deviation indicating the most stable performance. * **Best overall**: `thp-307`, due to its combination of stable FPS and competitive average FPS among all runs. # Issues: * The second configuration exhibits a slightly higher variance in GPU load, which could indicate less stability in handling graphical tasks. Additionally, it has a slightly elevated VRAM usage compared to others which might not be optimal. # Summary The benchmarking results for the `THP Shrinker` scenario under a `powersave` Linux scheduler show minimal differences among the tested configurations. While each performed fairly well, the `thp-358` configuration achieved the highest FPS, but the `thp-307` configuration demonstrated the best overall performance thanks to its low variance in FPS and solid average FPS rendering. The performance impact across all setups remained consistent, ensuring that the stress-ng load did not sway resources dramatically in any one direction, excluding the higher variance and VRAM usage noted in the second setup.