Benchmark #7

Download
Minecraft "rail" beanchmark - BORE vs rusty vs bpfland

Idle system, 6.9.7-3-cachyos-lto, scx-scheds-git 0.1.10.r190.ga72c905-4. Build a simple rail track, disabled weather, mobs, always day, no mouse movements. Basically a benchmark in Minecraft. 😅

Submitted 2 months ago by erikas2

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Arch Linux 34 GB 6.9.7-3-cachyos-lto performance
csx_rusty Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Arch Linux 34 GB 6.9.7-3-cachyos-lto performance
scx_bpfland Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Arch Linux 34 GB 6.9.7-3-cachyos-lto performance
### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `scx_bpfland` has the highest average FPS, performing approximately 2% higher than the next highest run. - **Smoothest FPS**: `csx_rusty` achieved the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation and variance, around 32% more stable than the next most stable run. - **Best overall**: `scx_bpfland` stands out as the best overall with a combination of the highest average FPS and comparable stability to `csx_rusty`. ### Issues - `BORE` run underperformed significantly with FPS almost 53% lower on average compared to the other two runs. All provided system configurations match, indicating a potential underlying issue that adversely affects its FPS. ### Summary This benchmark evaluates three runs with identical hardware and software specifications in a Minecraft "rail" benchmark. The `scx_bpfland` run outperformed others in terms of average FPS, followed closely by `csx_rusty`, which exhibited the lowest variance, making it the most stable run. However, `BORE` recorded significantly lower FPS, hinting at underlying performance issues despite similar hardware and software setups. The analysis indicates that while `scx_bpfland` leads in performance, `csx_rusty` excels in stability, providing a balanced view of the benchmarks.