# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `fair` with an average FPS slightly surpassing the others, providing a significantly better performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `fair`, as it exhibits the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating the most consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `fair` due to having the highest performance while maintaining smoothness, making it the best choice for gameplay. # Issues: * In comparison, the configuration with the highest variance in FPS shows a decrease in performance stability, especially notable in the `rusty` setup, where the variance is significantly higher than others. * The memory usage and GPU core clock show no variety, which could indicate potential inefficiencies or optimization issues not related to FPS but affect resource management. # Summary The benchmark compares the performance of different configurations using the `schedutil` Linux scheduler across the same hardware and operating system conditions. Notably, the `fair` configuration emerges as the top performer, offering the highest average FPS and the smoothest gameplay experience, making it the optimal choice for this series of tests. The other configurations like `rusty` and `lavd` reveal higher variance, indicating less consistent gameplay, which may affect the overall gaming experience. However, all tests consistently utilize the same amount of GPU and RAM, suggesting some optimizations may be applicable for resource usage across various scenarios.