# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Rusty` with approximately 4% higher average FPS than most other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `fair` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `fair` due to its balance of high average FPS and low variance, suggesting it offers the best experience overall. # Issues: * One configuration consistently used lower VRAM and hence experienced lower GPU temperatures by about 7% compared to others. This run also performed roughly 5% worse in terms of FPS, likely affecting the gameplay experience. * A run showed RAM usage about 10% higher than the rest with a relatively stable FPS, indicating poor memory management or potential optimization issues not related to FPS. * Another configuration had CPU usage about 8% higher than typical runs, indicating potential inefficiencies as it did not result in a corresponding increase in performance. # Summary The benchmark compares different Linux schedulers on the same hardware when running "Assassin's Creed Revelations" on `CachyOS`. The `fair` scheduler performs best overall, providing smooth and stable frame rates. Meanwhile, the `Rusty` scheduler achieves the highest FPS, though it leads to increased VRAM usage and subsequently, higher power consumption and lower GPU temperatures. It's evident that scheduler choice can greatly impact both performance and system resource usage, making balanced considerations important depending on specific needs and hardware characteristics.