Benchmark #722

Download
Heavy IA Area + Constant Camera Panning AC IV Black Flag

Submitted 1 week ago by aarrayy

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.11.7-1-cachyos-tenhz performance
BPFLAND CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.11.7-1-cachyos-tenhz performance
FAIR CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.11.7-1-cachyos-tenhz performance
LAVD CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.11.7-1-cachyos-tenhz performance
RUSTY CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.11.7-1-cachyos-tenhz performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with a mean FPS approximately 3% higher than others, showcasing strong performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD` has the lowest standard deviation in FPS, indicating the most consistent frame rate. * **Best overall**: `LAVD` strikes a balance with consistent frame rates and respectable FPS performance. # Issues: * There's a notable decrease in FPS stability in the run with a variance approximately 250% higher than another run, indicating potential fluctuations in frames. * Another run demonstrated even lower minimum FPS (around 35% compared to competitors), significantly impacting frame pacing and user experience. # Summary The benchmark runs for the "Heavy IA Area + Constant Camera Panning" in "AC IV Black Flag" across different configurations using the same version of `CachyOS`, `AMD Radeon R7 370` GPU, `AMD FX-6300` CPU, and `Linux kernel 6.11.7-1` reveal performance variations. For instance, the run with the highest average FPS provides the top raw performance, while another run with the lowest standard deviation showcases a more stable gaming experience. The balance was best captured in a particular run that offered consistent performance without sacrificing too many FPS. However, two runs highlighted issues with FPS stability and significantly lower minimum FPS values, pointing towards potential inconsistent frame rendering or other anomalies affecting the frame pacing during the benchmark. These insights can help in understanding which scheduler or configuration is optimal for both performance and experience in such a load-intensive scenario.