# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `FORSPOKEN_bfq` with around 2% higher average FPS than the second-best run, providing the best peak performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `FORSPOKEN_deadline` has around 15% lower standard deviation and variance compared to other runs, indicating a more consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `FORSPOKEN_deadline`, as it offers a good balance with almost the highest stability and only slightly lower FPS than the top performer. # Issues: * One configuration consistently had lower FPS by around 2% on average compared to others, coupled with lower GPU temps, which could suggest different performance tuning or thermal limits. * Variation in GPU core clocks and VRAM used suggests possible underutilization or throttling in the lowest-performing configuration. # Summary This benchmark compared different Linux scheduler configurations, specifically how the BFS, Deadline, Kyber, and default schedulers affect gaming performance on the same hardware. The `FORSPOKEN_deadline` scheduler stood out with the smoothest and most consistent frame rates, making it the best choice for stability. In contrast, the BFQ scheduler achieved slightly higher FPS but at the cost of more significant variability. The configuration without an advanced scheduler showed the lowest performance and may benefit from further optimization. Overall, testing across schedulers reveals that while minor differences in frame rates exist, stability can be markedly improved with appropriate configurations.