# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND-5ms` shows a slight advantage in average FPS, outperforming the other configuration. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND-5ms` offers a marginally lower standard deviation and variance in FPS, suggesting more consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND-5ms` provides the best overall balance between higher average FPS and stability with lower FPS variance. # Summary This benchmark compares two configurations of the `BPFLAND` scheduler, specifically focusing on different time slices of 5ms and 20ms. The 5ms configuration delivers marginally better average FPS and smoother performance, indicated by lower FPS variance, in comparison to the 20ms setting. Both configurations use identical systems and environmental variables, highlighting that the change in time slice size is the main differentiator in performance. Overall, the 5ms slice shows slight superiority in both average FPS and frame smoothness, making it a better choice under the tested conditions while keeping the system's power-saving features.