# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `fair-stock` with the highest average FPS. * **Smoothest FPS**: `fair-stock` with the lowest standard deviation and variance. * **Best overall**: `fair-stock` with a combination of highest FPS and smoothest performance. # Issues: * The test with the `bpfland-5ms-slice` configuration showed slightly lower FPS stability compared to others, with a higher variance than several other configurations. * Lower CPU temperatures and utilization were observed in the `fair-stock` run, which might suggest less strain on hardware during this benchmarking setup compared to others with similar performance. # Summary The benchmark compared the performance of `bpf` and `fair` CPUs using different slice setups while running on a consistent hardware configuration with the `performance` Linux scheduler. The `fair-stock` configuration delivered the best overall performance, achieving the highest average FPS and the smoothest gaming experience, indicated by the lowest FPS variance. This suggests that, under identical conditions, the `fair-stock` setup offers a more consistent performance advantage in this game benchmarking scenario.