# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE-le9uo` with significantly higher FPS compared to other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE-le9uo` due to the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `BORE-le9uo` due to a well-balanced high FPS and smooth frame rate. # Issues: * The run with the `bpfland` configuration demonstrates significantly lower FPS than the others by a considerable percentage, which could affect performance expectations. * The `lavd` run has a slight discrepancy in the Linux kernel version (`cachyos` compared to `cachyos-naim`), though this is not the primary focus, it is worth noting for consistency in environment settings. # Summary The benchmark compares the performance of different Linux schedulers (`bore`, `lavd`, and `bpfland`) under the CachyOS operating system using the same hardware configuration. The `BORE` scheduler with the specific configuration stood out, delivering consistently high FPS and smooth operation, making it the most efficient choice in this scenario. Meanwhile, the `bpfland` scheduler consistently exhibited lower performance metrics, indicating room for optimization or adjustment when compared to its counterparts. Overall, this analysis highlights the substantial impact of scheduler choice on gaming performance in a controlled environment.