# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with an average FPS higher than the alternative. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` due to having a lower standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `lavd` as it offers smoother performance with only a slight decrease in average FPS compared to the other run. # Summary In the benchmark comparing `BORE` and `lavd` on `osu!stable` with `stress-ng` on `CachyOS`, both using the `powersave` Linux scheduler, the `BORE` configuration provided the highest average FPS, indicating a potential for peak performance where raw frame output is the focus. However, `lavd` delivered a significantly smoother experience with lower fluctuation in frame times and FPS variance. Despite the slightly reduced average FPS, `lavd`'s consistency makes it the preferable choice for stable and reliable performance in this particular benchmarking scenario. Both setups used identical hardware and configurations, which solidifies the findings that the difference in performance is purely due to the scheduler variations being tested.