# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bmq` with approximately 22% higher FPS compared to `lavd`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` with a standard deviation approximately 15% lower than `bmq`. * **Best overall**: `bmq` offering a significant FPS advantage while maintaining competitive smoothness. # Issues: * The `bore` run performed with approximately 10% lower average FPS compared to `lavd`, indicating it is less competitive in performance. * `bore` also showed a higher variance, contributing to less stable performance. * The `bore` and `lavd` runs used the same `powersave` scheduler and kernel version, while the `bmq` run used a different kernel version (`6.12.1-1-cachyos-bmq`), offering potentially advantageous configurations. # Summary This benchmark compared the performance of different configurations and kernel versions, focusing on the execution performance of `osu!stable` alongside `stress-ng` under various settings on CachyOS. It is evident that the `bmq` setup with kernel `6.12.1-1-cachyos-bmq` performed the best in terms of FPS, demonstrating the benefits of using this configuration for performance-critical applications. While the `lavd` showed superior frame stability, combining attributes efficiently, the `bore` configuration fell short in key metrics, especially in FPS and stability, making it less favorable for optimal performance.