# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd-main-nofreq` with approximately 12% higher mean FPS compared to the lowest performing run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-main` with the lowest variance in FPS, indicating the most consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `lavd-main-nofreq` due to its combination of high FPS and reasonable stability, making it the top performer. # Issues: * The run using the configuration associated with a specific pull request had approximately 15% lower mean FPS compared to the best-performing configuration, suggesting potential inefficiencies or issues with FPS stability. # Summary In this benchmark comparison using `osu!stable` with `stress-ng` under the `lavd` configuration, the different runs were executed using identical hardware and software configurations on CachyOS with the `powersave` scheduler. The main branch configuration showed a balance between performance and stability, leading in terms of smoothness and high FPS. Meanwhile, the configuration derived from a pull request exhibited lower performance, indicating it might not be as optimized as the main configurations. This highlights the significance of using well-tuned configurations to achieve optimal FPS and frame time performance.