# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd-default` with marginally higher average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-2max` with the lowest frame time standard deviation and variance. * **Best overall**: `lavd-2max` due to the smoothest FPS while maintaining competitive FPS performance with others. # Issues: * The run with `lavd-4max` slightly underperforms in terms of FPS consistency, having a higher variance in FPS and frame time compared to others. * The run using `lavd-5max` also shows a similar issue of slightly higher variability in FPS. * Configuration across all runs is consistent with the same hardware and settings, confirming that variations in performance are due specifically to the `lavd` slice tuning. # Summary This benchmark compares the impact of different `lavd` slice tuning settings on performance while running osu!stable alongside stress-ng on CachyOS with a uniform hardware and software configuration. Underlaid by a `powersave` Linux scheduler, the results highlight how variations in maximum slice tuning can affect performance characteristics. The default `lavd` setting provided the highest FPS, whereas a lower maximum slice count (`lavd-2max`) resulted in the smoothest and most stable performance, suggesting that a less aggressive slice configuration can enhance workload stability without drastically sacrificing FPS.