Benchmark #804

Download
Horizon Zero Dawn Camera spin

Submitted 4 months ago by aarrayy

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
FLASH-5ms CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.1-1-cachyos-tenhz schedutil
FLASH CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.1-1-cachyos-tenhz schedutil
BPFLAND-5ms CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.1-1-cachyos-tenhz schedutil
BPFLAND CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.1-1-cachyos-tenhz schedutil
RUSTY CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.1-1-cachyos-tenhz schedutil
BORE CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.1-1-cachyos-tenhz schedutil
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `RUSTY` and this run demonstrates the highest average FPS, showcasing the capability to deliver a superior framerate in this benchmark. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND-5ms` and this run achieves the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating the most consistent FPS without significant fluctuations. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND-5ms` because of its balance of high FPS and the smoothest performance compared to other runs. # Issues: * The GPU core clock in the 'BORE' configuration differs significantly from others, and its higher variance indicates instability compared to other runs. * The 'BORE' run shows increased RAM usage, which may affect overall performance stability. * The 'RUSTY' configuration displays a decrease in CPU load compared to other runs, which may indicate underutilization affecting system performance balance. # Summary This benchmark primarily compares different configurations using the same hardware on `CachyOS` and the `schedutil` scheduler, likely focusing on variations in GPU performance settings or other system optimizations. The run labeled `RUSTY` achieves the highest average FPS, suggesting it has been optimized for peak framerate, potentially through more aggressive tuning. In contrast, `BPFLAND-5ms` maintains the smoothest experience with minimal FPS variation and provides the best overall balance of performance and stability. The `BORE` configuration stands out negatively with its increased resource use and variability, which could signify less efficient handling of the test scenario.