# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd` with the highest mean FPS, over 10% better than other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, at least 4% more stable than others. * **Best overall**: `lavd` is the best with both high FPS and smooth performance. # Issues: * `flash-s-l-5000` and `bpfland-s-l-5000` show 11% and 9% lower FPS on average compared to `lavd`. * The `flash-s-l-5000` run exhibits a 10% higher variance compared to `lavd`, indicating less stable performance. * `bpfland-s-l-5000` has a GPU power usage that is 5% lower, which could correlate to the lower FPS performance. # Summary This benchmark compared performance using different configurations on the same hardware and software setup, specifically the comparison of `lavd`, `bpfland`, and `flash` variants on `CachyOS` with the `powersave` Linux scheduler. The `lavd` configuration stands out with the highest average FPS and the smoothest frame consistency. On the other hand, both `bpfland` and `flash` configurations showed lower performance and consistency, likely due to less effective resource management under load. This suggests that `lavd` offers optimal performance for the setup tested, making it the superior option for this particular stress test with osu!stable.