# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND` with consistently higher FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `SIMPLE-FIFO` with the lowest standard deviation and variance. * **Best overall**: `RUSTY-20ms-max-5msmin` provides a good balance with slightly lower FPS but more stability compared to top performer. # Issues: * One configuration under the `LAVD` label showed significantly lower FPS, by around 20-25% compared to others, suggesting a potential inefficiency with this setup. * The `BPFLAND-server-profile-5ms` had a high variance in FPS, indicating unstable performance with fluctuations. * All tests were conducted under the same hardware, which means the significant difference in FPS is likely due to the scheduler configuration. # Summary: The benchmark compared various configurations using the same hardware and software setup, primarily focusing on different `sched_ext` scheduler profiles like `RUSTY`, `SIMPLE`, `LAVD`, and `BPFLAND`. The run with the highest FPS was `BPFLAND`, indicating it delivered the best raw performance. However, `SIMPLE-FIFO` had the most stable performance, making it ideal for consistency in frame delivery. The `RUSTY-20ms-max-5msmin` configuration achieved a good balance, providing stability with reasonable FPS, making it the best overall. However, certain configurations under `LAVD` and `BPFLAND-server-profile-5ms` showed either lower performance or instability, suggesting potential areas for further optimization or investigation.