Submitted 3 months ago by aarrayy
Label | OS | GPU | CPU | RAM | OS specific |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAVD | CachyOS | AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) | AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor | 12 GB | 6.12.6-1-cachyos-1000hz performance |
BORE | CachyOS | AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) | AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor | 12 GB | 6.12.6-1-cachyos-1000hz performance |
BORE
with a mean FPS approximately 2% higher than the counterpart.LAVD
with a standard deviation of FPS about 17% lower, indicating more stable performance.LAVD
provides a slightly more stable experience while maintaining near the same level of performance, making it the better overall choice.This benchmark compares the performance of the BORE
5.9.3 and LAVD
schedulers on a system running CachyOS
, with high CPU usage and the performance
scheduler. Both configurations utilized the same hardware, including the AMD FX-6300 processor and Radeon R7 370 GPU. While the BORE
scheduler provided a marginally higher FPS, the LAVD
scheduler delivered smoother overall gameplay with significantly lower variance and standard deviation in framerate, indicating a more consistent gaming experience. Overall, the LAVD
configuration exhibits a better balance between stability and performance.