# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with a mean FPS approximately 2% higher than the counterpart. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD` with a standard deviation of FPS about 17% lower, indicating more stable performance. * **Best overall**: `LAVD` provides a slightly more stable experience while maintaining near the same level of performance, making it the better overall choice. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of the `BORE` 5.9.3 and `LAVD` schedulers on a system running `CachyOS`, with high CPU usage and the `performance` scheduler. Both configurations utilized the same hardware, including the AMD FX-6300 processor and Radeon R7 370 GPU. While the `BORE` scheduler provided a marginally higher FPS, the `LAVD` scheduler delivered smoother overall gameplay with significantly lower variance and standard deviation in framerate, indicating a more consistent gaming experience. Overall, the `LAVD` configuration exhibits a better balance between stability and performance.