# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE-penalty-scale-2520` with an average FPS around 3% higher than any other run, offering the best raw performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD` with a variance in FPS about 28% lower than the next closest run, indicating the most consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `BORE-penalty-scale-2520`, despite having a higher FPS variance compared to `LAVD`, it still maintains stability with exceptional FPS performance, making it the best balanced choice for high performance and reasonably smooth operation. # Issues: * The run with divergent GPU temperatures is due to variance, which is notably higher, suggesting cooling inefficiencies rather than an FPS issue. This run impacts variance irrelevantly, as it doesn't affect FPS. * Inconsistencies in CPU temperature before reaching maximum recorded levels hint at cooling concerns rather than FPS or performance degradation. # Summary The benchmark contrasts various configurations of the `BORE` tool, predominantly on the `CachyOS` environment, operating under a uniform hardware setup consisting of an AMD GPU and CPU. The configurations tested include boosts, defaults, offsets, and scales, allowing for a comparative analysis of performance impacts. The `penalty-scale-2520` configuration emerged as a prominent performer in FPS, achieving an optimal balance of performance and stability. The `LAVD` configuration excelled in providing a stable and smooth gaming experience, free of noticeable stutters. Overall, this series of runs provides a valuable assessment of how different tuning parameters can influence gaming performance on a specific Linux kernel and hardware context.