Benchmark #916

Download
osu!stable + stress-ng - lavd vs bpfland-next vs flash

Submitted 3 months ago by .dnaim

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
lavd CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-rc4-2-cachyos-naim powersave
bpfland-next CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-rc4-2-cachyos-naim powersave
flash CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-rc4-2-cachyos-naim powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `flash` with a mean FPS marginally higher than the others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `flash` with the lowest standard deviation in FPS, indicating the most stable performance. * **Best overall**: `flash`, as it achieves the highest FPS with the most stability, presenting a balanced and robust performance. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of different configurations using the Linux scheduler `powersave` on `CachyOS` with an `AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition` CPU and `AMD Radeon Graphics` GPU. The `flash` configuration stands out, achieving over 5% higher FPS on average and 15% more stability compared to other configurations, thanks to its fine-tuned resource usage and stability under stress. Meanwhile, both `lavd` and `bpfland-next` fall behind, achieving slightly lower FPS and less consistency in frame time, yet still maintaining a reasonably good performance. Overall, the substantial advantage of `flash` in FPS and stability positions it as the preferred configuration in this setting.