Benchmark #917

Download
AC Unity: BORE 5.9.4 vs BPFLAND-NEXT vs LAVD

Submitted 3 months ago by aarrayy

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.7-1-cachyos-1000hz performance
BPFLAND-next CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.7-1-cachyos-1000hz performance
LAVD CachyOS AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.12.7-1-cachyos-1000hz performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND-next` with a mean FPS slightly higher than the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD` due to the lowest standard deviation and variance. * **Best overall**: `LAVD` as it provides a good balance of high FPS and smooth frame consistency. # Issues: * The run comparing the `BORE` scheduler has significantly lower performance compared to the other schedulers tested, particularly in FPS smoothness and overall CPU load. This might indicate the scheduler is less efficient in handling this particular workload or task distribution. * All runs use similar hardware and software environments with CachyOS and the same kernel version. However, `BORE` scheduler's performance variance and CPU load variance are notably higher, pointing to potential inefficiencies when under the same test conditions. # Summary This benchmark aimed to compare the performance of different Linux schedulers using the `AC Unity` game on CachyOS. The `BPFLAND-next` scheduler delivered the highest average FPS, while the `LAVD` scheduler excelled in providing the smoothest gameplay experience. Although the `BORE` scheduler was tested under identical hardware and software conditions, it demonstrated relatively poorer performance in terms of consistency and CPU load, making `LAVD` the superior choice considering overall stability and FPS delivery within this test environment.